AeroYield — early deployment

AeroYield turns a flight schedule into a commercial plan.

An AI commercial operating system for airports. It forecasts passenger demand at the flight and cohort level, then orchestrates the commercial estate — retail, food and beverage, duty-free, parking and advertising — against that forecast.

The commercial problem

Two revenue streams, one of them unmanaged

An airport earns from two streams. Aeronautical revenue — landing fees, aircraft parking, passenger service charges — is regulated, and its margin is capped by the regulator. Non-aeronautical revenue — retail, food and beverage, duty-free, car parking, advertising — is unregulated, carries a far higher margin, and is where the profit actually comes from.

The second stream is not driven by how many passengers pass through the terminal. It is driven by which passengers, at which hour, in which state. A late-night low-cost domestic bank and an evening wide-body long-haul bank move through the same square metres and produce almost nothing in common: different dwell, different categories, different willingness to spend, different staffing requirement. Managed as a daily average, both are served badly.

The information needed to tell them apart already exists. It sits in the flight schedule, in historical load factors, in day-of-operations changes and in concessionaire point-of-sale. AeroYield joins those sources into one demand picture, resolves it down to 30-minute windows, and gives the commercial estate something to act on.

The system

Five engines

One forecast, four ways to act on it, and a governed data layer underneath.

Flight-schedule demand forecasting

AeroYield ingests flight schedules, historical load factors, day-of-operations changes and concessionaire point-of-sale, and builds a demand profile per route and per cohort. The output is a 30-minute-window prediction, 7 to 90 days ahead.

  • Zone footfall, by 30-minute window
  • Category demand — food and beverage, retail, duty-free, convenience
  • Staffing requirement per zone and shift
  • Re-forecast on day-of-operations changes, not on a nightly batch
Schedules, load factors and point-of-sale resolve into a per-cohort demand profile, then into 30-minute-window predictions.

Worked example

Same terminal. Same square metres. Two different businesses.

Two departure banks in one terminal, roughly nineteen hours apart. The estate around them is identical. What it should be doing is not.

01:20

Late-night low-cost, domestic

High load factor, short dwell, price-sensitive, travelling light. Duty-free is close to irrelevant. Hot food, water and convenience carry the bank — and most of the estate is closed.

Food & bev.
61
Convenience
24
Retail
18
Duty-free
4
Parking
12

21:10

Evening long-haul, wide-body

Long dwell, early arrival at the terminal, high duty-free intent, meaningful lounge use, and a parking profile measured in days rather than hours. The same floor plate, asked to do something entirely different.

Food & bev.
27
Convenience
15
Retail
31
Duty-free
38
Parking
34

Illustrative model showing relative category demand on a 0–100 index. Not measured data, and not a forecast for any airport.

Deployment

What integration actually involves

AeroYield reads before it writes. Every write path is granted per mechanism and per zone, and every one of them has a rollback.

01
Schedule and operations
AODB, flight schedule feeds and day-of-operations changes, over the interfaces you already run. No new operational system is introduced into the critical path.
02
Commercial systems
Concessionaire point-of-sale at aggregate level, parking and pre-booking systems, lounge and food-and-beverage ordering.
03
Estate and screens
Digital signage and screen networks, wayfinding, and the ordering surfaces in the airline or airport app.
04
Environment and rollback
Read-only throughout the pilot. Write access is granted per mechanism and per zone, with a rollback path and an audit trail on every action AeroYield takes.
05
Standards
PLACEHOLDER: list the specific schedule, point-of-sale and signage interface standards supported, with versions.

Governance

Compliance and data governance

The commercial case does not survive a privacy failure, so the constraints are designed in rather than bolted on.

Legal basis

DPDP Act

Processing is designed to the Digital Personal Data Protection Act: purpose limitation, consent governance, and defined retention. Data fiduciary and processor roles are set out in the contract before deployment.

Method

Anonymised analytics

Footfall and dwell analytics are aggregated at the zone and cohort level. AeroYield does not need to know who a passenger is in order to forecast what a cohort will do.

Explicitly excluded

No facial recognition

AeroYield does not use facial recognition and does not build biometric passenger profiles. This is a design constraint, not a configuration option.

Output

Aggregated reporting

Reports resolve to cohorts, zones and windows. Advertisers and concessionaires receive cohort demand, never passenger records.

Questions

The objections worth raising first

The first stage is a baseline audit. It commits you to nothing.

Book a call